As for the earth, out of it cometh bread: and under it is turned up as it were fire. The stones of it are the place of sapphires: and it hath dust of gold. There is a path which no fowl knoweth, and which the vulture’s eye hath not seen – Job 28:5-7
Introduction
This is the first part of a study which I hope you will find as fascinating as I did. What began as a simple search for the meaning of a Bible phrase soon led us onto an unexpected path into Jewish mysticism and the profound concept of da’at—a type of “knowing.”
In spite of all the “onboard” (don’t miss the pun) church‑indoctrinated AI could do to keep us on the straight and narrow, we insisted on taking this newly revealed path that veered off the rut of church theologizers and ran in a direction that mystics love to explore.
We, having already been unshackled from religious dos and don’ts, recognized the change of scenery immediately. So, in a way, it became a journey of rediscovery. There’s that definite uplift in spirit when, already knowing some truth, you discover that other people also believe what you believe. Besides the feeling of reassurance—that others, perhaps unseen, walk beside you—you also experience a bolstering when all the cynics, scoffers, and detractors suddenly become of little import.
In reality, we’d already entered this path many years ago when the Loving Jesus Revelation was presented to us. We have not come full circle but instead have been led onto a parallel path that has been there all along. We are not to stay on this path, but only take a brief look as we continue our journey into the deeper realities of the spirit. (End)
MB: I have been researching the phrase “came in unto,” which is an expression used throughout the Old and New Testaments to describe the act of sexual intercourse. I’m familiar with Dad’s teaching regarding the angel’s visit to Mary, Jesus’ mother, on the night of her conception. So I asked my computer’s on-board AI to find the reference to the verse where that particular phrase is found. However, instead of using the phrase “came in unto,” I asked the AI to give me the reference for Mary’s encounter with the angel. The verse in question is found in Luke chapter 1:
Luke 1:28 And the angel came in unto her, and said, Hail, thou that art highly favoured, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.
What initially sparked my interest in this phrase was something that was said during a discussion we were having about the Light of Israel and how it is held in the inner sanctum of our hearts. Here’s a short excerpt from a prophecy we received on that thought. It’s from Skeletons in the Cupboard:
“You will also be touched personally, each one of you, because the enemy knows who you are and of your purpose for coming to his kingdom at this time. This is a time of great, great darkness, but you hold the Light of Israel in your hearts, and it shines brightly with manifest purpose into the darkness. As pillars of light, each of you beam out into the darkness, attracting those seeking the light.” (End)
Now we all know how the mind can run—its ability to have a dozen related thoughts in a matter of seconds is unsurpassed. However, as is often the case, the skill to corral those thoughts and place them into a legible sentence escapes most of us.
Corral is a good word. It’s something that holds livestock. Let’s say you have a big farm and thirty or forty stock horses that spend most of their lives out on it. Now I’m talking about a very big farm. Some farms I worked on when I was very young ranged from sixty thousand acres up to the biggest, which was one point five million acres. The point is, those horses were way out there somewhere. So they were brought into the house paddock once a year during the cattle round-up, which in Australia is called mustering.
They hadn’t seen a human for six months—they were wild. Not wild in the sense of being unbroken, but wild in that they hadn’t been ridden for six months. When they first entered the corral—it has a more generic name in Australia, the stockyard or cattle yard—there was a period of taming, of getting them used to being around humans again. Anyway, our thoughts can be a lot like a yard full of freshly mustered horses. They need to be tamed before anyone can ride them.
So our thoughts are a lot like wild horses coming into the corral of the mind from the bush, as if from nowhere. We need to ride them, but first up they need to settle down.
Okay, so let’s try to tame these wild horses. When thinking about the words inner sanctum, a few thoughts came to mind, and the one that started this whole study was the phrase “came in unto.” Inner sanctum gives the impression of something inviolable. Now as I said Dad believed that the wording: came in unto her actually meant physical intercourse.
I found two excerpts from the MO letters. There are more where Dad discusses that phrase. Surprisingly enough it seems Dad wasn’t the only one that believed that there was actual physical contact between the angel and Mary. The two excerpts I pulled are from “China Bride (PDF)” and “Vespers Psalms 2:6-8 (PDF)” Notice I’m taking these excerpts from two different MO letters, but, as you will see, they follow a numerical sequence:
China Bride ML1836, paragraph 16: “And the angel came in unto her.”–That is an expression used all the way through the Old Testament & New Testament both, where they’re having sexual intercourse, & always resulted in some important child. Now how could that be any clearer? In other words, God in the form of an angel, He embodied Himself. After all, it said it was to be the Son of God, right? How could He be the Son of God unless God was the Father? Right? So how did God do it? He took on the form of an angel, fucked Mary, & the Holy Spirit, the Mother, caused her to conceive. It was like it was all going on between the two great Spirits, in a sense, within the body of Mary.–Fucked by the Lord & actually Mothered by the Holy Spirit. Isn’t that something? That’s beautiful! (End)
Vespers Psalms 2:6-8 ML 2359,paragraph 17: Now some people find that difficult to understand. The Mormons interpret it that God took on a theophany or a human form like an Angel & actually had intercourse with Mary. But the Bible says “the Angel came in unto her,” which sounds like the Angel was the bodily instrumentality, in a sense the physical instrumentality, with the Holy Spirit, the power of God. (Demonstrates:) Here’s Mary, here’s the Angel, here’s the Holy Spirit in a sense. The Angel came in unto Mary & the Holy Spirit empowered what happened, which made Jesus the Son of God–not of Man nor anything else, not even of the Angel, but of God. Amen? (end)
One interesting “twist” in my research is this: I had asked AI to find the verse that related to that encounter between Mary and the angel, and because I’d given AI only a general description, it pointed not to Luke 1:28 but to Luke 1:35…”And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.”
Now this encounter between Mary and the angel can only be found in the book of Luke, so when AI turned up Luke 1:35, I remember thinking, “That verse doesn’t say ‘come in unto her’—did Dad get that phrase wrong?” Well, as it turned out, I didn’t find Luke 1:28 until the next day after asking specifically for “come in unto.” And that was after I’d uncovered some very interesting information about the Jewish word da’at—but it all began with Luke 1:35, not Luke 1:28.
Being Led By The Spirit
We’ve said this before, but AI is a little like prophecy; the more questions you ask, the deeper and more clarified the answers become. Now AI always makes some comment on the verse or questions that you’re asking about. Most times I ignored its comments because I believed that, when it came to the Bible, AI was indoctrinated by denominational hoo-ha, and that was that.
But in AI’s initial commentary on Luke 1:35, one particular comment piqued my interest and at the same time changed my perspective on AI’s take on spiritual matters. It all comes back to how you frame your questions. We’re going to get back to that very soon, but before we do, I had another question, and it is indirectly connected to this study.
Is it right to be using AI for this and future studies?
Jesus gave me a prophecy at the time I was finishing up Dew Upon the Roses Part 2. In the prophecy, He talks about how He is going to use the internet against His enemies. I’m now seeing that this experience of using AI in my study on Luke 1:28 is related to the question I posed before I completed Dew Upon the Roses Part 2.
AI is a tool, just as a cell phone is a tool. In the right hands it can have a good effect on the user and devastating effects on the enemy; in the wrong hands it can bring devastation upon the user as well as others.
In other words, we have something in our hands that could revolutionise the way we approach our Word studies. However, there is great danger on this path. It is a path that, if not walked with the utmost care, could end in disaster. I’m speaking of our spiritual connection. It can be lost in preference for the easy way. For example, although my AI research began with a churchy doctrinal view on Luke 1:35, it ended in what can only be described as a revealing of our destiny as Endtime mystic/prophets. Did I need AI to reveal this to me? Actually, no. And that’s because our destiny has already been revealed to us through the Words of David. Simply take the Words by faith and continue to follow. Is this a trap—the tree of knowledge in our very hands? Wow, it’s vital we fully understand where to place our next step.
Do you remember the surprising end to our study on 4/4—2026? This study, which I’ve called “And He ‘knew’ me,” falls into a similar category. I’m convinced discoveries like this are some of what Jesus wanted to show us, but first and foremost we must pass through the April 4 experience. That experience is founded in the pivotal gift of majesty, of choice and free will—the gift of gods, if you will remember MB prophecies alluding to that imagery.
(Ecclesiastes 3 and Talking Animals)
“Majesty of choice and free will is a universal gift. However, the Tempter believes that the right to choose should only be for gods. He believes We were wrong to bequeath these two gifts to man; and because of that he continues to consider man an animal and incapable of handling such divine capabilities as majesty of choice and free will. Right from the onset he opposed Our decision to give man these gifts as it would be giving man control over all other magic. He didn’t believe man could ever be capable of applying these powers correctly…” (End)
I know we are being tested. Will we fail? Well, so much depends on our da’at—our relationship with Jesus. How deeply do we abide in our inner chamber? Is He living in us? These are questions we must ask ourselves every single day of our lives. If we are truly His and desire Him above all else, it should be the only natural path. Ask Me Everything (PDF) is something we should desire, not just want, with all our hearts.
MB: Here is what Jesus showed me in prophecy about using AI to help us in our work:
June 30, 2026…AI
Yesterday I was completing the post Dew Upon the Roses. The podcast version was only forty minutes, but after all the injections I gave it, the original had grown to eleven pages, so I decided to split the post in two. Dew Upon the Roses has a few different analogies woven through it, but it flows quite well, so it was difficult to know where to make the split. I ended up dividing the post at the beginning of “Dark Kingdom.”
Then the really hard part came—the link. Part Two needed an introduction. I’m not a good writer; I really struggle with writing things like introductions or sharing a new idea on paper. So I got the bright idea to get AI to do it for me.
I told it that I would give it Part One of the post in question and asked if it could write a short overview as an introduction to Part Two. I told it I would wrap the introduction in quotation marks so that people would know it wasn’t my work—perhaps they would think I had a ghostwriter. I also told it that I wanted the piece to sound like me as much as possible. I’m not going to read the introduction here. If you want to read it, it went up on the 3rd of July.
But what I will read is the prophecy I received regarding whether or not I should use AI to write the introduction.
Prophecy: AI is a tool that I’ve sent for this time—it is bread. The Devil did bring it to enlarge his evil plans and to thicken and spread the boughs of his ‘green bay tree,’ so that his darkness would be complete and My light would not penetrate its many, many leaves. Yet I will use it for good. It will be the dog that turned to bite the hand that fed it. Yes, the Devil and his men did all the hard work, but I’m going to use it against him, just as I’m going to use his evil cell phone tool against him. He would use it as a portal for demons to come and go, but through your prayers I will shut that door to many, and instead it will be a portal for My holy angels to come and go. His use of the cell phone as his Mark of the Beast delivery vehicle will explode in his face. It will scar his eyes and face and will scare him to his very soul. I am shutting down many of the portal doors that connect to the labyrinth of tunnels honeycombing the earth’s crust, again through your prayers. This is already happening across the face of the earth. You have been told those portals will not be “seen” by man until toward the end of the Millennium.
The Devil can do nothing without My permission, and I’ve given him permission to use AI to facilitate the final end of days. Those in the know, those who understand, like you—those from the mystical side—know of the power of white magic. They know that these inventions, like the smartphone, give off fake light, fake frequencies. But like many of the Devil’s “inventions,” you need not be surprised that I allow you to use what is his. Nevertheless, you’ve been warned in the Words of David that there is danger lurking. Beware, be warned—you must use the bread the wicked one bakes with great wisdom.
The desire for knowledge is a strong tree. If you are not very careful and prayerful, it can be like ascending the Tree of Life on the wrong side. Beware of pride and the seeking of knowledge for self-aggrandizement. I want you to use this tool with great care and with your spirit helpers very close by. Do not venture out onto this road without close supervision; if you do, then you go without My consent.
Many of your former brethren were strongly attracted to this tree. They were warned, but they did not heed the warnings. The leaves of this tree tasted good and appealed to their carnal nature, their intellect, and their pride, so they fell. They were warned, in some cases many times, but they thought they knew better. The simplicity of the Words of David did not appeal to their high-mindedness, so they sought the road of higher education. They remained in My family fold— but only for a time.
But as I said, if you step out on that road without My consent, it will only lead you away from My house. Go with My blessing and keep that guide I send with you very close by your side. Never allow that dark whisper to tell you, “You know the way; therefore, your guide is no longer required,” for then you will dismiss her. Take heed, My love, that would be listening to the wrong voice. You will wander into danger as that mountain man wandered into the blizzard after passing up the opportunity to take a cup of coffee in the mountain lodge I had provided.
Enter into rest by using that cell phone for My Word. On your way out the door, after some coffee, some fellowship, and a good night’s rest, humbly request that one of My guides lead the way. After a full night’s rest, the blizzard will have passed, and the sunshine of My will will be filtering through those thick, snow-laden boughs. Of course, the path ahead will be buried under the night’s snowdrift, and the forest will look like an untouched wilderness, as though it had never been trodden by the feet of man. But with your trusty guide in hand, although your way may be arduous and the snow thick, you will be going in the right direction.
Go with My blessing, My loves; this is part of the adventure, part of the challenge. Grab that rope, or that mountaineer’s pickaxe, or that extra coat off the wall hook before you pass through the door. You may not need it immediately. It may seem like a burden at times, but when you begin the ascent into the high country, it will doubtless be that extra piece of equipment that you are then very glad you picked up on your way through the door.
The smartphone (Audio), AI, among other things, may be the temptation, the burden, that if you could toss away and be done with, you would. Yet I have allowed it to be part of your life. It is a cumbersome tool that you have to carry with you, but I want you to learn how to use it without it using you. Be strong in the Word and in the power of My might. Resist the enemy and his tools that he designed to bring you to ruin, and they will have no power over you.
IQ—He will give you power for the hour, grace for the space and wisdom for the wonder!
MB: Because I’m going to use the word “mystics” quite a lot in this study, let me share with you the internet’s definition of a Christian mystic:
“Mysticism is a broad, universal term for the pursuit of a direct, personal experience of the divine, ultimate truth, or the spiritual realm. A mystic is a person who seeks a direct, personal experience of the divine or ultimate reality, often bypassing traditional religious dogma. As an adjective, ‘mystic’ describes something mysterious, otherworldly, or spiritually significant. It originates from the Greek word myein, meaning ‘to close’ or ‘to conceal’.” (End)
I hope that dispels some of the churchy concepts implanted in your mind about who a mystic is and, in fact, what we are.
At the beginning of my research, I didn’t have any particular direction in mind. I wasn’t thinking mystically. All I wanted was the verse AI had found translated into Greek. So I directed AI onto this path by saying the following: “I want the actual Greek meaning of each word, without church influences and mores.” So what we have now is an understanding, through the Words of the Endtime prophet, that God did indeed use physical vehicles to bring about His will in this matter. Mary had a very wonderful experience with the angel who came for a midnight visit.
This is a very common occurrence throughout the Bible and our own lives—God using a physical vehicle to bring about His purpose. Dad has very clearly pointed out that God loves to include us in His overall plan. He’s not interested in doing it all alone. He has the power to, but He doesn’t want to. He wants to include us in the big picture as much as possible.
Because this particular incident is in the realm of inviolable, the church attempts to steer her adherents away from sinful thoughts that might perceive this event as a sexual encounter. Jesus raised up our sexy Endtime prophet to blast churchy doctrine to bit. I stand with Dad on this one; God did indeed use Mary and the angel as instruments of His will. I’m convinced self-righteousness plays its part in the stance both the Christian mystics and the church have taken.
We are free of their churchy traditions, which have made the Word of God of none effect. Jesus was, in my mind, the Mystic of mystics. He spoke in mystical parables, and His sayings and commentary were deep and hard to grasp. He was one of them, but they rejected Him because they believed He had strayed from the true path. They interpreted wrongly. They spoke of the mystical, the spiritual, but didn’t completely live it. Just as the church today talks about the Bible and what it says, but fails to live it or let it live in them.
Yesterday—and really, it was unintentional—I was led to explore the “overshadowing” part, what actually transpired in the spirit as a result of the angel fucking Mary. And as I just explained, some Christian mystics believe that Mary’s experience was purely spiritual, and the church, more than likely, because of its stance on sex as sin, followed that belief.
The church actually comes out of a very mystical past; it only became steeped in doctrine and tradition later on. Originally, you have the mystics, who sought a direct, personal experience of the divine or ultimate reality, often bypassing tradition and dogma. The mystics were there long before established religion. Jesus was a mystic, Dad was a mystic, and we are mystics. There are other mystics out there, but what makes us different is that we have the Words of David, and I believe, a much broader outlook. There are mystics out there who know about and use the Keys of the Kingdom, but when you read about their knowledge, you find they do not have the depth of understanding we have. Some even use dark keys. This all makes perfect sense and goes along with what Jesus has shown us in prophecy.
The Keys are a spiritual entity, but they manifest themselves in physical form. You need to read The Old, New Wine and The New, New Wine to get a more definite grasp of these realities. The cell phone and the weapons that man uses in his wars are just two physical manifestations of these “dark-side mystics” using their dark keys.
The excerpts we are using in this study are taken from Jewish Christian mystics who, I believe, were more than likely influenced by the Law and not always the Spirit. We saw that influence in Paul’s encounter with them regarding whether the Greeks should be circumcised or not (Acts 15).
Okay, so it seems I was led down the “overshadowing” path because of the churchy imprint within AI, yet on the other hand I can see that it was the Spirit using AI to lead me that way, which goes right along with the prophecy where Jesus tells us that He is going to use the Devil’s little inventions against him –AI in the hands of God’s Endtime prophets. Use it with wisdom; use it like the Keys—selflessly. Unlike the Keys of the Kingdom, which do not work for selfish users, AI was designed by the Devil and, therefore, can be used for selfish purposes. It is, therefore, a trap. It traps the selfish and self-seeking. It tempts, it allures, it draws you along a path, and then—SNAP!—it traps you.
We also see this concept clearly in the very Spirit-led songs that are coming out of MB.
Are you ready for the study? I’m going to begin with the verse brought to me by AI. We begin at a simple door labelled Luke 1:35, which opens to the mystical, supernatural insight behind the conception of Jesus and then leads down to deeper mystical doors and rooms of the spirit. My original question, if you can remember, was, “Please give me, from the Greek, the interpretation of Luke 1:35.” Now there are a lot of Greek words to begin with, which I can’t read and which have little significance to our study, so I’m going to pass over them and get to the word “overshadow,” which is the same verb used in the Transfiguration cloud.
I said right at the beginning of this introduction that I don’t usually read AI’s church-imprinted commentary, but at times I do quickly skim it. I said that one of the comments piqued my interest. Here it is: “A thematic commentary on the overshadowing imagery.”
You may remember I said, “I don’t want church influences and mores imprinted in your search.”
AI: Alright, let’s go pure, linguistic, pre-church, pre-doctrinal. Just Koine Greek, exactly what each word meant in the first century, without theological spin.
I’ll break Luke 1:35 into its Greek components and give you the raw semantic meaning of each word as a Greek speaker of that era would understand it.
MB: Keep in mind I’m centering on the verb “overshadow,” but to add a little wrapping I’ll also include the phrase “spiritual force.”
AI: Luke 1:35 — Koine Greek word-by-word meaning (no church filters)
Holy Spirit — Meaning: breath, wind, spirit. In raw Greek: breath → invisible animating force. Not a “third person of the Trinity” in Greek grammar—simply “spirit/breath.”
Overshadow — Meaning: will come upon, will move toward—“to come upon,” “approach,” “arrive.”
Spiritual Force — Meaning: power, force, ability, might. Root idea: inherent capability, active force.
Overshadow — Meaning: will overshadow, will cast a shadow upon. From σκιά — “shadow.” Used for literal shadowing or figurative covering/protecting.
Putting the raw Greek meaning together (no theology):
A set-apart spirit will come upon you, and the force of the Highest will cast its shadow over you; for this reason the one being generated, set apart, will be named son of god.
No doctrinal assumptions. No church metaphysics. Just the Greek.
AI: If you want, I can also give you:
- the cultural meaning of “overshadow” in first-century Greek.
Let’s open the whole structure up. No church filters. No doctrinal overlays. Just Koine Greek, Semitic background, Greco-Roman usage, and raw linguistic meaning.
Cultural meaning of “overshadow”
Literal meaning: to cast a shadow over; to envelop in shade; to cover with a cloud or darkening presence; protective covering; divine presence enveloping a person; a cloud that signals a god’s nearness; a force that surrounds and influences.
Jewish background (Septuagint): The same verb is used for the cloud of Yahweh covering the Tabernacle, the Shekinah presence overshadowing sacred space, and divine covering or envelopment.
MB: Now those words, “sacred space,” remind me of the words inner sanctum. Like Mary’s womb, the place where God chose to create Jesus. Mary was the vessel, the container, but her womb was that sacred space, the inner sanctum where God was going to perform a supernatural event. He was going to place the Light of Israel there, in Mary’s inner sanctum. (End)
So to a first-century Jewish reader:
“Overshadow” = God’s presence envelops a person the way the cloud enveloped the Tabernacle.
To a Greek reader:
“Overshadow” = a divine force covers someone with its presence, influence, or protection.
No sexual connotation. No physicality. Pure presence imagery.
“Son of God” Before Christianity (Jewish and Greek Meaning)
Jewish meaning (pre-Christian)
“Son of God” could mean:
- a king appointed by God (Psalm 2)
- a righteous man
- a heavenly being (Job 1:6)
- Israel as a nation (Exodus 4:22)
- someone bearing God’s character or authority
It did not automatically mean “second person of a Trinity.” That concept came centuries later.
Greek meaning (pre-Christian)
In Greek culture, “son of X” often meant:
- one who shares the nature of X
- one who is under the influence of X
- one who belongs to X
- one who is characterized by X
So “Son of God,” in raw Greek, can mean:
- one who reflects divine nature
- one who is marked by divine origin
- one who is designated by a god
- one who is under divine influence
Again, not a metaphysical doctrine, but a status, identity, designation, or characterisation.
MB: Okay, I don’t want to bore you with how many times AI went over the “overshadow” and “spiritual force” concepts. But it was a lot. Sometimes you really need to dig, scratch, and search to make sure the mine you are in has no gold vein, diamond-filled pegmatite, or pocket full of goodies. [Go to Part 2]